Reikna is a library containing various GPU algorithms built on top of PyCUDA and PyOpenCL. The main design goals are:
The installation is as simple as
$ pip install reikna
This section contains a brief illustration of what reikna does. For more details see basic and advanced tutorials.
CLUDA is an abstraction layer on top of PyCUDA/PyOpenCL. Its main purpose is to separate the rest of reikna from the difference in their APIs, but it can be used by itself too for some simple tasks.
Consider the following example, which is very similar to the one from the index page on PyCUDA documentation:
import numpy
import reikna.cluda as cluda
N = 256
api = cluda.ocl_api()
thr = api.Thread.create()
program = thr.compile("""
KERNEL void multiply_them(
GLOBAL_MEM float *dest,
GLOBAL_MEM float *a,
GLOBAL_MEM float *b)
{
const SIZE_T i = get_local_id(0);
dest[i] = a[i] * b[i];
}
""")
multiply_them = program.multiply_them
a = numpy.random.randn(N).astype(numpy.float32)
b = numpy.random.randn(N).astype(numpy.float32)
a_dev = thr.to_device(a)
b_dev = thr.to_device(b)
dest_dev = thr.empty_like(a_dev)
multiply_them(dest_dev, a_dev, b_dev, local_size=N, global_size=N)
print((dest_dev.get() - a * b == 0).all())
If you are familiar with PyCUDA or PyOpenCL, you will easily understand all the steps we have made here. The cluda.ocl_api() call is the only place where OpenCL is mentioned, and if you replace it with cluda.cuda_api() it will be enough to make the code use CUDA. The abstraction is achieved by using generic API module on the Python side, and special macros (KERNEL, GLOBAL_MEM, and others) on the kernel side.
The argument of compile() method can also be a template, which is quite useful for metaprogramming, and also used to compensate for the lack of complex number operations in CUDA and OpenCL. Let us illustrate both scenarios by making the initial example multiply complex arrays. The template engine of choice in reikna is Mako, and you are encouraged to read about it as it is quite useful. For the purpose of this example all we need to know is that ${python_expression()} is a synthax construction which renders the expression result.
import numpy
from numpy.linalg import norm
from reikna import cluda
from reikna.cluda import functions, dtypes
N = 256
dtype = numpy.complex64
api = cluda.ocl_api()
thr = api.Thread.create()
program = thr.compile("""
KERNEL void multiply_them(
GLOBAL_MEM ${ctype} *dest,
GLOBAL_MEM ${ctype} *a,
GLOBAL_MEM ${ctype} *b)
{
const SIZE_T i = get_local_id(0);
dest[i] = ${mul}(a[i], b[i]);
}
""", render_kwds=dict(
ctype=dtypes.ctype(dtype),
mul=functions.mul(dtype, dtype)))
multiply_them = program.multiply_them
r1 = numpy.random.randn(N).astype(numpy.float32)
r2 = numpy.random.randn(N).astype(numpy.float32)
a = r1 + 1j * r2
b = r1 - 1j * r2
a_dev = thr.to_device(a)
b_dev = thr.to_device(b)
dest_dev = thr.empty_like(a_dev)
multiply_them(dest_dev, a_dev, b_dev, local_size=N, global_size=N)
print(norm(dest_dev.get() - a * b) / norm(a * b) <= 1e-6)
Note that CLUDA Thread is created by means of a static method and not using the constructor. The constructor is reserved for more probable scenario, where we want to include some reikna functionality in a larger program, and we want it to use the existing context and stream/queue (see the Thread constructor). In this case all further operations with the thread will be performed using the objects provided.
Here we have passed two values to the template: ctype (a string with C type name), and mul which is a Module object containing a single multiplication function. The object is created by a function mul() which takes data types being multiplied and returns a module that was parametrized accordingly. Inside the template the variable mul is essentially the prefix for all the global C objects (functions, structures, macros etc) from the module. If there is only one public object in the module (which is recommended), it is a common practice to give it the name consisting just of the prefix, so that it could be called easily from the parent code.
For more information on modules, see Tutorial: modules and snippets; the complete list of things available in CLUDA can be found in CLUDA reference.
Now it’s time for the main part of the functionality. reikna provides GPGPU algorithms in the form of Computation-based cores and Transformation-based plug-ins. Computations contain the algorithm itself; examples are matrix multiplication, reduction, sorting and so on. Transformations are parallel operations on inputs or outputs of computations, used for scaling, typecast and other auxiliary purposes. Transformations are compiled into the main computation kernel and are therefore quite cheap in terms of performance.
As an example, we will consider the matrix multiplication.
import numpy
from numpy.linalg import norm
import reikna.cluda as cluda
from reikna.linalg import MatrixMul
api = cluda.ocl_api()
thr = api.Thread.create()
shape1 = (100, 200)
shape2 = (200, 100)
a = numpy.random.randn(*shape1).astype(numpy.float32)
b = numpy.random.randn(*shape2).astype(numpy.float32)
a_dev = thr.to_device(a)
b_dev = thr.to_device(b)
res_dev = thr.array((shape1[0], shape2[1]), dtype=numpy.float32)
dot = MatrixMul(a_dev, b_dev, out_arr=res_dev)
dotc = dot.compile(thr)
dotc(res_dev, a_dev, b_dev)
res_reference = numpy.dot(a, b)
print(norm(res_dev.get() - res_reference) / norm(res_reference) < 1e-6)
Most of the code above should be already familiar, with the exception of the creation of MatrixMul object. The computation constructor takes two array-like objects, representing arrays that will participate in the computation. After that the computation object has to be compiled. The compile() method requires a Thread object, which serves as a source of data about the target API and device, and provides an execution queue.
Now imagine that you want to multiply complex matrices, but real and imaginary parts of your data are kept in separate arrays. You could create additional kernels that would join your data into arrays of complex values, but this would require additional storage and additional calls to GPU. Transformation API allows you to connect these transformations to the core computation — matrix multiplication — effectively adding the code into the main computation kernel and changing its signature.
Let us change the previous example and connect transformations to it.
import numpy
from numpy.linalg import norm
import reikna.cluda as cluda
from reikna.core import Type
from reikna.linalg import MatrixMul
from reikna.transformations import combine_complex
api = cluda.ocl_api()
thr = api.Thread.create()
shape1 = (100, 200)
shape2 = (200, 100)
a_re = numpy.random.randn(*shape1).astype(numpy.float32)
a_im = numpy.random.randn(*shape1).astype(numpy.float32)
b_re = numpy.random.randn(*shape2).astype(numpy.float32)
b_im = numpy.random.randn(*shape2).astype(numpy.float32)
arrays = [thr.to_device(x) for x in [a_re, a_im, b_re, b_im]]
a_re_dev, a_im_dev, b_re_dev, b_im_dev = arrays
a_type = Type(numpy.complex64, shape=shape1)
b_type = Type(numpy.complex64, shape=shape2)
res_dev = thr.array((shape1[0], shape2[1]), dtype=numpy.complex64)
dot = MatrixMul(a_type, b_type, out_arr=res_dev)
combine_a = combine_complex(a_type)
combine_b = combine_complex(b_type)
dot.parameter.matrix_a.connect(
combine_a, combine_a.output, a_re=combine_a.real, a_im=combine_a.imag)
dot.parameter.matrix_b.connect(
combine_b, combine_b.output, b_re=combine_b.real, b_im=combine_b.imag)
dotc = dot.compile(thr)
dotc(res_dev, a_re_dev, a_im_dev, b_re_dev, b_im_dev)
res_reference = numpy.dot(a_re + 1j * a_im, b_re + 1j * b_im)
print(norm(res_dev.get() - res_reference) / norm(res_reference) < 1e-6)
We have used a pre-created transformation combine_complex() from reikna.transformations for simplicity; developing a custom transformation is also possible and described in Writing a transformation. From the documentation we know that it transforms two inputs into one output; therefore we need to attach it to one of the inputs of dot (identified by its name), and provide names for two new inputs.
Names to attach to are obtained from the documentation for the particular computation; for MatrixMul these are out, a and b.
In the current example we have attached the transformations to both inputs. Note that the computation has a new signature now, and the compiled dot object now works with split complex numbers.
Modules and snippets are important primitives in CLUDA which are used in the rest of reikna, although mostly internally. Even if you do not write modules yourself, you will most likely use operations from the functions module, or common transformations from the transformations module, which are essentially snippet and module factories (callables returning Snippet and Module objects). Therefore it helps if you know how they work under the hood.
Snippets are Mako template defs (essentially functions returning rendered text) with the associated dictionary of render keywords. Some computations which are parametrized by custom code (for example, PureParallel) require this code to be provided in form of a snippet with a certain call signature. When a snippet is used in a template, the result is quite straightworward: its template function is called, rendering and returning its contents, just as a normal Mako def.
Let us demonstrate it with a simple example. Consider the following snippet:
add = Snippet("""
<%def name="add(varname)">
${varname} + ${num}
</%def>
""",
render_kwds=dict(num=1))
Now we can compile a template which uses this snippet:
program = thr.compile("""
KERNEL void test(int *arr)
{
const SIZE_T idx = get_global_id(0);
int a = arr[idx];
arr[idx] = ${add('x')};
}
""",
render_kwds=dict(add=add))
As a result, the code that gets compiled is
KERNEL void test(int *arr)
{
const SIZE_T idx = get_global_id(0);
int a = arr[idx];
arr[idx] = x + 1;
}
If the snippet is used without parentheses (e.g. ${add}), it is equivalent to calling it without arguments (${add()}).
The root code that gets passed to compile() can be viewed as a snippet with an empty signature.
Modules are quite similar to snippets in a sense that they are also Mako defs with an associated dictionary of render keywords. The difference lies in the way they are processed. Consider a module containing a single function:
add = Module("""
<%def name="add(prefix, arg)">
WITHIN_KERNEL int ${prefix}(int x)
{
return x + ${num} + ${arg};
}
</%def>
""",
render_kwds=dict(num=1))
Modules contain complete C entities (function, macros, structures) and get rendered in the root level of the source file. In order to avoid name clashes, their def gets a string as a first argument, which it has to use to prefix these entities’ names. If the module contains only one entity that is supposed to be used by the parent code, it is a good idea to set its name to prefix only, to simplify its usage.
Let us now create a kernel that uses this module:
program = thr.compile("""
KERNEL void test(int *arr)
{
const SIZE_T idx = get_global_id(0);
int a = arr[idx];
arr[idx] = ${add(2)}(x);
}
""",
render_kwds=dict(add=add))
Before the compilation render keywords are inspected, and if a module object is encountered, the following things happen:
With the code above, the rendered module will produce the code
WITHIN_KERNEL int _module0_(int x)
{
return x + 1 + 2;
}
and the add keyword in the render_kwds gets its value changed to _module0_. Then the main code is rendered and appended to the previously renderd parts, giving
WITHIN_KERNEL int _module0_(int x)
{
return x + 1;
}
KERNEL void test(int *arr)
{
const SIZE_T idx = get_global_id(0);
int a = arr[idx];
arr[idx] = _module0_(x);
}
which is then passed to the compiler. If your module’s template def does not take any arguments except for prefix, you can call it in the parent template just as ${add} (without empty parentheses).
Warning
Note that add in this case is not a string, it is an object that has __str__() defined. If you want to concatenate a module prefix with some other string, you have to either call str() explicitly (str(add) + "abc"), or concatenate it inside a template (${add} abc).
Modules can reference snippets in their render_kwds, which, in turn, can reference other modules. This produces a tree-like structure with the snippet made from the code passed by user at the root. When it is rendered, it is traversed depth-first, modules are extracted from it and arranged in a flat list in the order of appearance. Their positions in render_kwds are replaced by assigned prefixes. This flat list is then rendered, producing a single source file being fed to the compiler.
Note that if the same module object was used without arguments in several other modules or in the kernel itself, it will only be rendered once. Therefore one can create a “root” module with the data structure declaration and then use that structure in other modules without producing type errors on compilation.
The amount of boilerplate code can be somewhat reduced by using Snippet.create and Module.create constructors. For the snippet above it would look like:
add = Snippet.create(
lambda varname: "${varname} + ${num}",
render_kwds=dict(num=1))
Note that the lambda here serves only to provide the information about the Mako def’s signature. Therefore it should return the template code regardless of the actual arguments passed.
If the argument list is created dynamically, you can use template_def() with a normal constructor:
argnames = ['varname']
add = Snippet(
template_def(argnames, "${varname} + ${num}"),
render_kwds=dict(num=1))
Modules have a similar shortcut constructor. The only difference is that by default the resulting template def has one positional argument called prefix. If you provide your own signature, its first positional argument will receive the prefix value.
add = Module.create("""
WITHIN_KERNEL int ${prefix}(int x)
{
return x + ${num};
}
""",
render_kwds=dict(num=1))
Of course, both Snippet and Module constructors can take already created Mako defs, which is convenient if you keep templates in a separate file.
Sometimes you may want to pass a module or a snippet inside a template as an attribute of a custom object. In order for CLUDA to be able to discover and process it without modifying your original object, you need to make your object comply to a discovery protocol. The protocol method takes a processing function and is expected to return a new object of the same class with the processing function applied to all the attributes that may contain a module or a snippet. By default, objects of type tuple, list, and dict are discoverable.
For example:
class MyClass:
def __init__(self, coeff, mul_module, div_module):
self.coeff = coeff
self.mul = mul_module
self.div = div_module
def __process_modules__(self, process):
return MyClass(self.coeff, process(self.mul), process(self.div))
Modules were introduced to help split big kernels into small reusable pieces which in CUDA or OpenCL program would be put into different source or header files. For example, a random number generator may be assembled from a function generating random integers, a function transforming these integers into random numbers with a certain distribution, and a PureParallel computation calling these functions and saving results to global memory. These two functions can be extracted into separate modules, so that a user could call them from some custom kernel if he does not need to store the intermediate results.
Going further with this example, one notices that functions that produce randoms with sophisticated distributions are often based on simpler distributions. For instance, the commonly used Marsaglia algorithm for generating Gamma-distributed random numbers requires several uniformly and normally distributed randoms. Normally distributed randoms, in turn, require several uniformly distributed randoms — with the range which differs from the one for uniformly distributed randoms used by the initial Gamma distribution. Instead of copy-pasting the function or setting its parameters dynamically (which in more complicated cases may affect the performance), one just specifies the dependencies between modules and lets the underlying system handle things.
The final render tree may look like:
Snippet(
PureParallel,
render_kwds = {
base_rng -> Snippet(...)
gamma -> Snippet(
} Gamma,
render_kwds = {
uniform -> Snippet(...)
normal -> Snippet(
} Normal,
) render_kwds = {
uniform -> Snippet(...)
}
)
All reikna computation classes are derived from the Computation class and therefore share the same API and behavior. A computation object is an opaque typed function-like object containing all the information necessary to generate GPU kernels that implement some algorithm, along with necessary internal temporary and persistent memory buffers. Before use it needs to be compiled by calling compile() for a given Thread (thus using its associated device and queue). This method returns a ComputationCallable object which takes GPU arrays and scalar parameters and calls its internal kernels.
One often needs to perform some simple processing of the input or output values of a computation. This can be scaling, splitting complex values into components, padding, and so on. Some of these operations require additional memory to store intermediate results, and all of them involve additional overhead of calling the kernel, and passing values to and from the device memory. Reikna porvides an API to define such transformations and attach them to “core” computations, effectively compiling the transformation code into the main kernel(s), thus avoiding all these drawbacks.
Before talking about transformations themselves, we need to take a closer look at the computation signatures. Every Computation object has a signature attribute containing funcsigs.Signature object. It is the same signature object as can be exctracted from any Python function using funcsigs.signature function (or inspect.signature from the standard library for Python >= 3.3). When the computation object is compiled, the resulting callable will have this exact signature.
The base signature for any computation can be found in its documentation (and, sometimes, can depend on the arguments passed to its constructor — see, for example, PureParallel). The signature can change if a user connects transformations to some parameter via connect(); in this case the signature attribute will change accordingly.
All attached transformations form a tree with roots being the base parameters computation has right after creation, and leaves forming the user-visible signature, which the compiled ComputationCallable will have.
As an example, let us consider a pure parallel computation object with one output, two inputs and a scalar parameter, which performs the calculation out = in1 + in2 + param:
from __future__ import print_function
import numpy
from reikna import cluda
from reikna.cluda import Snippet
from reikna.core import Transformation, Type, Annotation, Parameter
from reikna.algorithms import PureParallel
import reikna.transformations as transformations
arr_t = Type(numpy.float32, shape=128)
carr_t = Type(numpy.complex64, shape=128)
comp = PureParallel(
[Parameter('out', Annotation(carr_t, 'o')),
Parameter('in1', Annotation(carr_t, 'i')),
Parameter('in2', Annotation(carr_t, 'i')),
Parameter('param', Annotation(numpy.float32))],
"""
VSIZE_T idx = ${idxs[0]};
${out.store_idx}(
idx, ${in1.load_idx}(idx) + ${in2.load_idx}(idx) + ${param});
""")
The details of creating the computation itself are not important for this example; they are provided here just for the sake of completeness. The initial transformation tree of comp object looks like:
| out | >>
>> | in1 |
>> | in2 |
>> | param |
Here the insides of || are the base computation (the one defined by the developer), and >> denote inputs and outputs provided by the user. The computation signature is:
>>> for param in comp.signature.parameters.values():
... print(param.name + ":" + repr(param.annotation))
out:Annotation(Type(complex64, shape=(128,), strides=(8,)), role='o')
in1:Annotation(Type(complex64, shape=(128,), strides=(8,)), role='i')
in2:Annotation(Type(complex64, shape=(128,), strides=(8,)), role='i')
param:Annotation(float32)
Now let us attach the transformation to the output which will split it into two halves: out1 = out / 2, out2 = out / 2:
tr = transformations.split_complex(comp.parameter.out)
comp.parameter.out.connect(tr, tr.input, out1=tr.real, out2=tr.imag)
We have used the pre-created transformation here for simplicity; writing custom transformations is described in Writing a transformation.
In addition, we want in2 to be scaled before being passed to the main computation. To achieve this, we connect the scaling transformation to it:
tr = transformations.mul_param(comp.parameter.in2, numpy.float32)
comp.parameter.in2.connect(tr, tr.output, in2_prime=tr.input, param2=tr.param)
The transformation tree now looks like:
| out | ----> out1 >>
| | \-> out2 >>
>> | in1 |
>> in2_prime ------> | in2 |
>> param2 ----/ | |
| param |
As can be seen, nothing has changed from the base computation’s point of view: it still gets the same inputs and outputs to the same array. But user-supplied parameters (>>) have changed, which can be also seen in the value of the signature:
>>> for param in comp.signature.parameters.values():
... print(param.name + ":" + repr(param.annotation))
out1:Annotation(Type(float32, shape=(128,), strides=(4,)), role='o')
out2:Annotation(Type(float32, shape=(128,), strides=(4,)), role='o')
in1:Annotation(Type(complex64, shape=(128,), strides=(8,)), role='i')
in2_prime:Annotation(Type(complex64, shape=(128,), strides=(8,)), role='i')
param2:Annotation(float32)
param:Annotation(float32)
Notice that the order of the final signature is obtained by traversing the transformation tree depth-first, starting from the base parameters. For more details see the note in the documentation for connect().
The resulting computation returns the value in1 + (in2_prime * param2) + param split in half. In order to run it, we have to compile it first. When prepare_for is called, the data types and shapes of the given arguments will be propagated to the roots and used to prepare the original computation.
api = cluda.ocl_api()
thr = api.Thread.create()
in1_t = comp.parameter.in1
in2p_t = comp.parameter.in2_prime
out1 = thr.empty_like(comp.parameter.out1)
out2 = thr.empty_like(comp.parameter.out2)
in1 = thr.to_device(numpy.ones(in1_t.shape, in1_t.dtype))
in2_prime = thr.to_device(numpy.ones(in2p_t.shape, in2p_t.dtype))
c_comp = comp.compile(thr)
c_comp(out1, out2, in1, in2_prime, 4, 3)
There are some limitations of the transformation mechanics:
This tutorial goes into more detail about the internals of computations and transformations, describing how to write them.
Reikna uses Mako extensively as a templating engine for transformations and computations. For the purpose of this tutorial you only need to know several things about the synthax:
Some common transformations are already available from transformations module. But you can create a custom one if you need to. Transformations are based on the class Transformation, and are very similar to PureParallel instances, with some additional limitations.
Let us consider a (not very useful, but quite involved) example:
tr = Transformation(
[
Parameter('out1', Annotation(Type(numpy.float32, shape=100), 'o')),
Parameter('out2', Annotation(Type(numpy.float32, shape=80), 'o')),
Parameter('in1', Annotation(Type(numpy.float32, shape=100), 'i')),
Parameter('in2', Annotation(Type(numpy.float32, shape=100), 'i')),
Parameter('param', Annotation(Type(numpy.float32))),
],
"""
VSIZE_T idx = ${idxs[0]};
float i1 = ${in1.load_same};
float i2 = ${in2.load_idx}(100 - idx) * ${param};
${out1.store_same}(i1);
if (idx < 80)
${out2.store_same}(i2);
""",
connectors=['in1', 'out1'])
Connectors. A transformation gets activated when the main computation attempts to load some value from some index in global memory, or store one to some index. This index is passed to the transformation attached to the corresponding parameter, and used to invoke loads/stores either without changes (to perform strictly elementwise operations), or, possibly, with some changes (as the example illustrates).
If some parameter is only queried once, and only using load_same or store_same, it is called a connector, which means that it can be used to attach the transformation to a computation. Currently connectors cannot be detected automatically, so it is the responsibility of the user to provide a list of them to the constructor. By default all parameters are considered to be connectors.
Shape changing. Parameters in transformations are typed, and it is possible to change data type or shape of a parameter the transformation is attached to. In our example out2 has length 80, so the current index is checked before the output to make sure there is no out of bounds access.
Parameter objects. The transformation example above has some hardcoded stuff, for example the type of parameters (float), or their shapes (100 and 80). These can be accessed from argument objects out1, in1 etc; they all have the type KernelParameter. In addition, the transformation code gets an Indices object with the name idxs, which allows one to manipulate index names directly.
A computation must derive Computation. As an example, let us create a computation which calculates output = input1 + input2 * param.
Defining a class:
import numpy
from reikna.helpers import *
from reikna.core import *
class TestComputation(Computation):
Each computation class has to define the constructor, and the plan building callback.
Constructor. Computation constructor takes a list of computation parameters, which the deriving class constructor has to create according to arguments passed to it. You will often need Type objects, which can be extracted from arrays, scalars or other Type objects with the help of from_value() (or they can be passed straight to Annotation) which does the same thing.
def __init__(self, arr, coeff):
assert len(arr.shape) == 1
Computation.__init__(self, [
Parameter('output', Annotation(arr, 'o')),
Parameter('input1', Annotation(arr, 'i')),
Parameter('input2', Annotation(arr, 'i')),
Parameter('param', Annotation(coeff))])
In addition to that, the constructor can create some internal state which will be used by the plan builder.
Plan builder. The second method is called when the computation is being compiled, and has to fill and return the computation plan — a sequence of kernel calls, plus maybe some temporary or persistent internal allocations its kernels use. In addition, the plan can include calls to nested computations.
The method takes two predefined positional parameters, plus KernelArgument objects corresponding to computation parameters. The plan_factory is a callable that creates a new ComputationPlan object (in some cases you may want to recreate the plan, for example, if the workgroup size you were using turned out to be too big), and device_params is a DeviceParameters object, which is used to optimize the computation for the specific device. The method must return a filled ComputationPlan object.
For our example we only need one action, which is the execution of an elementwise kernel:
def _build_plan(self, plan_factory, device_params, output, input1, input2, param):
plan = plan_factory()
template = template_from(
"""
<%def name='testcomp(kernel_declaration, k_output, k_input1, k_input2, k_param)'>
${kernel_declaration}
{
VIRTUAL_SKIP_THREADS;
const VSIZE_T idx = virtual_global_id(0);
${k_output.ctype} result =
${k_input1.load_idx}(idx) +
${mul}(${k_input2.load_idx}(idx), ${k_param});
${k_output.store_idx}(idx, result);
}
</%def>
""")
plan.kernel_call(
template.get_def('testcomp'),
[output, input1, input2, param],
global_size=output.shape,
render_kwds=dict(mul=functions.mul(input2.dtype, param.dtype)))
return plan
Every kernel call is based on the separate Mako template def. The template can be specified as a string using template_def(), or loaded as a separate file. Usual pattern in this case is to call the template file same as the file where the computation class is defined (for example, testcomp.mako for testcomp.py), and store it in some variable on module load using template_for() as TEMPLATE = template_for(__file__).
The template function should take the same number of positional arguments as the kernel plus one; you can view <%def ... > part as an actual kernel definition, but with the arguments being KernelParameter objects containing parameter metadata. The first argument will contain the string with the kernel declaration.
Also, depending on whether the corresponding argument is an output array, an input array or a scalar parameter, the object can be used as ${obj.store_idx}(index, val), ${obj.load_idx}(index) or ${obj}. This will produce the corresponding request to the global memory or kernel arguments.
If you need additional device functions, they have to be specified between <%def ... > and ${kernel_declaration}. Obviously, these functions can still use dtype and ctype object properties, although store_idx and load_idx will most likely result in compilation error (since they are rendered as macros using main kernel arguments).
Since kernel call parameters (global_size and local_size) are specified on creation, all kernel calls are rendered as CLUDA static kernels (see compile_static()) and therefore can use all the corresponding macros and functions (like virtual_global_flat_id() in our kernel). Also, they must have VIRTUAL_SKIP_THREADS at the beginning of the kernel which remainder threads (which can be present, for example, if the workgroup size is not a multiple of the global size).
CLUDA is the foundation of reikna. It provides the unified access to basic features of CUDA and OpenCL, such as memory operations, compilation and so on. It can also be used by itself, if you want to write GPU API-independent programs and happen to only need a small subset of GPU API. The terminology is borrowed from OpenCL, since it is a more general API.
Modules for all APIs have the same generalized interface. It is referred here (and references from other parts of this documentation) as reikna.cluda.api.
Each Thread contains a special allocator for arrays with data that does not have to be persistent all the time. In many cases you only want some array to keep its contents between several kernel calls. This can be achieved by manually allocating and deallocating such arrays every time, but it slows the program down, and you have to synchronize the queue because allocation commands are not serialized. Therefore it is advantageous to use temp_array() method to get such arrays. It takes a list of dependencies as an optional parameter which gives the allocator a hint about which arrays should not use the same physical allocation.
The stuff available for the kernel passed for compilation consists of two parts.
First, there are several objects available at the template rendering stage, namely numpy, reikna.cluda.dtypes (as dtypes), and reikna.helpers (as helpers).
Second, there is a set of macros attached to any kernel depending on the API it is being compiled for:
If defined, specifies that the kernel is being compiled for CUDA API.
If defined, specifies that the compilation for this kernel was requested with fast_math == True.
Synchronizes threads inside a block.
Modifier for a device-only function declaration.
Modifier for the kernel function declaration.
Modifier for the global memory pointer argument.
Modifier for the statically allocated local memory variable.
Modifier for the dynamically allocated local memory variable.
Modifier for the local memory argument in the device-only functions.
Modifier for inline functions.
The type of local/global IDs and sizes. Equal to unsigned int for CUDA, and size_t for OpenCL (which can be 32- or 64-bit unsigned integer, depending on the device).
Local, group and global identifiers and sizes. In case of CUDA mimic the behavior of corresponding OpenCL functions.
The type of local/global IDs in the virtual grid. It is separate from SIZE_T because the former is intended to be equivalent to what the backend is using, while VSIZE_T is a separate type and can be made larger than SIZE_T in the future if necessary.
Used to specify an explicit alignment (in bytes) for fields in structures, as
typedef struct {
char ALIGN(4) a;
int b;
} MY_STRUCT;
This macro should start any kernel compiled with compile_static(). It skips all the empty threads resulting from fitting call parameters into backend limitations.
This module contains various convenience functions which operate with numpy.dtype objects.
Classes necessary to create computations and transformations are exposed from the core module.
Major core API change:
Other stuff: